TIM BYRD’s The Pulp Pit™ – IF ADVENTURE HAS A NAME… Pulp on the Big Screen Part One

I’m back. I’m alive. Hope you are too.

As I write this, a great pulp hero is, by most accounts, stinking up the theaters. That’s a shame. Jason Momoa looks to be perfectly cast as Conan the Barbarian, but the movie around him apparently doesn’t serve him well. So we wind up with a Conan who is, himself, far better than Arnold, in a movie that is nowhere near as good. Of course, this is all hearsay; I will watch the film when it comes to disk, but opted to save my $20 once the bad reviews flooded in.

Meanwhile, Marvel Comics’ Captain America went back to its pulpy World War II roots and kicked major ass both critically and at the box office.

The presence of both these pulpish films on the big screen inspired me to take a look at some of the other such films we’ve gotten over the years. There are several I want to discuss, so I’ll stay on this topic next month, starting this month with some of the more obvious examples in the genre.

Based on the Lester Dent novel The Man of Bronze, which introduced Doc Savage to the world, this movie, like the current Conan, gave us a well-cast hero in a lousy film. Ron Ely, who played a very entertaining Tarzan on TV, was an excellent choice to play Doc. Unfortunately, hiring him was the one good choice made by the filmmakers. The supporting cast is terrible, the script is crap, and the direction is artless and hamfisted. The approach taken in making this movie also typifies the unfortunate tendency Hollywood, until recently, had in making movies based on pulp stories or comic books. Not trusting the material on its own merits, they camped it up, making it ridiculous and agonizing to watch. I watched this again with my son when he was eight, and you know what? He thought it was stupid. Campy crap doesn’t even work for little kids.

Of course, he is a smart kid. At three he hated Jar-Jar Binks, proving him a lot more sophisticated than George Lucas.

Yes. Trilogy. That latter-day embarrassment with escape by refrigerator from a nuclear blast, Shia LeBeouf swinging with monkeys, and woefully underutilized Karen Allen and Cate Blanchett doesn’t count.

When, exactly, did Lucas murder Steven Spielberg and replace him with a CGI dummy, anyway?

No list of pulp movies can stand tall without Raiders of the Lost Ark. Indiana Jones is the perfect pulp hero, battered and beaten but unbeatable, witty and (whip-)smart and charming, and capable of great feats but still (generally) operating within the realms of human capability. Raiders is also, simply, one of the greatest adventure films ever made, zooming along with incredible verve, astonishing action set pieces, vivid characters, and a huge, pounding pulp heart.

Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom is a mixed bag, but I love it. Creatively it’s a much bolder followup to the first film than the film that follows it, and to Lucas’s and Spielberg’s credit they not only try some new things but they go dark, in true hero’s journey tradition. There are three things that weaken the movie, though. In ascending order of badness, they are:

The script. The story itself is good, but Lucas hired his old American Graffiti pals Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz to do the screenplay this time around, quite a comedown after Lawrence Kasdan’s genius work on Raiders. Huyck and Katz are a bit tone-deaf with dialogue, and they fundamentally misunderstand Dr. Jones’s complete motivation with all that “fortune and glory” bullshit. Indiana Jones is a scientist. He’s an adrenalin junkie. But he isn’t a gloryhound, and isn’t in it for wealth. If he were, he’d be Belloq. I understand this flick is supposed to occur a few years earlier than Raiders, and they presumably wanted to show Indy grow into the man he was in that film, but the facile nature of their arc just doesn’t jibe with what we already know.  

• Spielberg. Yes, the brilliant director is one of the things wrong with the movie. Fortunately his failure is limited to a few moments, specifically some ridiculous stunts that are so outlandish they kick the viewer right out of the film (most egregious is the seemingly ten-mile plummet off a cliff in a rubber life raft to the rocky river below). Just because this is pulp doesn’t mean it doesn’t have to abide by its own internal reality. And he’s been criticized for this shit in this movie so much over the years, it’s astonishing he repeats the error even worse in that last film that doesn’t exist, so never mind.

    • Kate Capshaw as Willie Scott. ’Nuff fucking said.

Even with those things wrong with it, Temple is a lot of pulpish fun. It also has my favorite piece of John Williams scoring in the films other than the “Raiders March” itself, “Slave Children’s Crusade,” which plays over the best fight in the series as Indy battles a gigantic Thuggee on a perilous conveyor belt.

Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade, while not attaining Raiders-level greatness, is still a great flick. The father-son dynamic between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery is magnificent, and the dialogue crackles. “I’m as human as the next man.” “I was the next man, Dad!”

The action is great, the characters are great, and the final act, in which Indy has to solve the deadly riddles of the lost temple at Alexandretta in order to save his father’s life, is wonderful. But.

But the film, following on the heels of Temple of Doom‘s less than stellar performance, plays it safe by lifting too many elements and dynamics from Raiders. It’s like the filmmakers thought, Whoa, we shouldn’t have tried something different, let’s try to do the same thing again this time.

I know a lot of pulp fans don’t like this movie. But I (almost) love it.

It does make the common error of not trusting the source material and playing things for laughs, but unlike Doc Savage, it doesn’t descend into Adam West’s Batman levels of camp, and actually earns some real laughs. There is silliness in the film, but there is also some real wit. The banter between Lamont Cranston (the Shadow’s secret identity) and Margo Lane often feels like it came from an old Billy Wilder flick:

Margo: We need each other.

Lamont: No we don’t.

Margo: We have a connection.

Lamont: No we don’t.

Margo: Then how can you explain that I can read your thoughts?

Lamont: My thoughts are hard to miss.

Margo: And why is that?

Lamont: Psychically, I’m very well endowed.

Margo: I’ll bet you are.

Alec Baldwin is fantastic in the title role. As Lamont Cranston, who was Bruce Wayne before Bruce Wayne, he’s dashing and charismatic and smart. When he takes on the Shadow identity, his appearance actually changes, showing the darker self he usually hides, with his eyes going black and his nose taking on the sharp aquiline shape that was seen on hundreds of pulp covers. And the Shadow looks AWESOME. Baldwin has great physicality in the role (including a snappy two-gun quick-draw from his shoulder holsters), the costume design is gorgeous, and director Russell Mulcahy, for all his foibles as a storyteller, makes him look great both in some great action sequences and in some brilliantly composed and iconic hero shots. For that matter, the film in general is beautiful, capturing the Art Deco style of the era with elan. And Penelope Ann Miller’s Margo Lane is sizzling hot.


I’ll be back next month with more. In the meantime, feel free to discuss these films in the comments. I’ll be around, unless I have to gallivant off to save the world. It could happen.

Tim can be found on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/TimByrd
His Blog Under an Outlaw Moon at: http://www.tim-byrd.com
The Official Doc Wilde Website at: http://www.docwilde.com
This entry was posted in Awesome, Blockbuster, CAPTAIN AMERICA MOVIE, Common Sense, Cool Commentary, Doc Savage, Doc Wilde, Doc Wilde and the Frogs of the Doom, Film, Film Commentary, Film Review, Film Reviews, For Your Consideration, Fun, Geek Culture, IMJ Nation™, IMJ REGULAR FEATURE, INTERNATIONAL BEST SELLING AUTHOR, Inveterate Media Junkies™, Inveterate Media Junkies™ Exclusive, Inveterate Media Junkies™ Monthly Column, Inveterate Media Junkies™ Regular Feature, Marvel Studios, MOVIE POSTER, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movie Soundtracks, Movies, Music, The Pulp Pit™, The Pulp Pit™ with Tim Byrd, Tim Byrd and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to TIM BYRD’s The Pulp Pit™ – IF ADVENTURE HAS A NAME… Pulp on the Big Screen Part One

  1. PhilBetaGAMMA says:

    Really cool overviews, Tim! Cool 2 see that u’re back. My memories of Doc Savage r minimal, at best. Although l remember 4 some reason…liking Ely as the character. The most recent interpretation of the good doctor that l’ve last seen was AZZerello’s take on him in DC’s 1st Wave, where he would’ve been better off left untouched, but l digress.

    Indy, l just don’t know. Maybe it was a coming of age thing, but all l can say is; At one time, l was in love w/ that franchise, then 4 some reason…l fell out of love w/ it, and l really don’t know why.

    The Shadow Another film, l’m hazy on, but remeber liking Alec as the title character. And Penelope Ann Miller, l definitely remember her hotness! back in the day, she, along w/ Helen Hunt were my 1st choices, were they 2 do a Fantastic4 movie!

    Anyway, always cool 2 read up on your insights, Tim!
    p.s.
    Would one day love 2 hear your take on Warren Beatty’s Dick Tracy!

  2. jocrlujr says:

    I personally enjoyed the new Conan movie quite a bit, but I’d say your assessment is accurate.

  3. Tim Byrd says:

    JOCRLUJR, as I pointed out, I’m prejudging CONAN based on most of the reviews, from critics and friends, but have yet to see it. I’m looking forward to giving it a chance, and hope to enjoy it more than most did.

    PHIL, I enjoyed Azzarello’s take on Doc, but DC’s execution (and inability to find a writer for the Doc Savage book) sucked. I think First Wave could have rocked, but they blew it.

    As for DICK TRACY, it’s been many years since I saw it (probably opening weekend). I remember being delighted with the visuals and with Beatty as Tracy, but less taken with the story. But it has been a long time…

    TIM

    • PhilBetaGAMMA says:

      Understood. lt’s been a while since l saw DickTracy, myself. l do remember that there were plenty of folks knocking Beatty 4 being 2 old, but l felt that his “maturity’ gave DT it’s gravitas. Also l think its one of the few films hat Madonna actually was cast near pertectly.

      As 4 Azz, l know he’s garnered quite the following that loves what he writes, but my introduction 2 him was his 12pt Superman snoozefest.

      Anyway, thank u 4 responding so promptly, & l’ll be waiting dillegently 4 part two!
      Phil

  4. ed2962 says:

    Very cool article. Looking forward to more.

  5. Pingback: If Adventure Has A Name… (My Latest IMJ Pulp Column) « Under An Outlaw Moon

  6. Bill Crider says:

    I might be the only person in the world who sort of liked the Doc Savage movie. I thought it had moment or two that captured the spirit of at least the book covers if not the original stories. I also liked the choice of soundtrack music that everybody else hated. I agree about THE SHADOW. I didn’t care for the ending, but up until then I thoroughly enjoyed it.

  7. clarksavage says:

    The failure of Temple of Doom is that the filmmakers forgot who Indy is. In T.o.D. he is the luckiest man on the planet. That is not Indy. Indy gets by on guts and sheer determination. He doesn’t give up.

    I also watched the Doc movie with the kids and they didn’t like it either. But I agree that Ely is well cast and the only good part of the movie.

    I liked the Shadow, but I havent seen it since its theatrical release. I’m looking forward to seeing more of your column.

  8. Pingback: Two-Fisted Flickage (My Latest IMJ Pulp Column) « Under An Outlaw Moon

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s